I don't use optical discs much anymore, but I still like the idea of archiving things like family pictures on read-only media once in a while.
I don't use optical discs much anymore, but I still like the idea of archiving things like family pictures on read-only media once in a while.
The biggest benefit of M-DISC for DVDs was that it didn't use an organic dye, as those dyes tend to decay over time. The dominant BD-R recording mechanism (HTL) uses an inorganic recording medium so isn't affected by this problem.
There are differences in how BD-Rs are manufactured that can lead to big differences in longevity [0] but there are regular retail BD-Rs that outperform M-DISC in accelerated aging tests [1]. There are also DVD variants that outperform M-DISC [2].
Also, M-DISC hasn't produced any evidence for their BD-R discs. For their DVDs there were a few scientific studies they could point to that demonstrated their longevity, for BD-R they have no such evidence.
[0]: https://www.lne.fr/sites/default/files/inline-files/etude-qu...
[1]: https://www.lne.fr/sites/default/files/inline-files/etude-qu...
[2]: https://www.lne.fr/sites/default/files/inline-files/syylex-g...
Unfortunately that data is eight years old and I'm not even sure if Panasonic and Sony even make BD-Rs anymore. Seeing a lot of out of stock Japanese imports on Amazon.de for both of them. I can really only find Verbatim BD-Rs and they didn't really perform that well in the comparisons.
I've actually been interested in BD archiving for a bit but haven't gotten into it yet because of the initial costs. I have about 1.1 TB of data that I'd like to archive for the long-term.
You can always import them yourself. Tenso and Buyee both work great.
I think it's just that the western market doesn't care for them much, so you don't see anybody bothering to import them for you.