> It’s not about privatizing the service,
Yes it is.
> it’s about disrupting their ability to process mail in ballots for the election.
True, but those are complementary not mutually exclsuive motivations.
Yes it is.
> it’s about disrupting their ability to process mail in ballots for the election.
True, but those are complementary not mutually exclsuive motivations.
I don't play along with excuses. As I said, if it was really about that, they had numerous opportunities in the past four years.
I don't think either of those motivations is okay, in fact, I think the action being taken on either basis alone would be, and a fortiori them being taken with both motivations is, a serious abuse of executive power.