> It just creates a scapegoat to blame when things go wrong.
That's just how it works for other engineering disciplines; with the license, the scapegoat has the legal power to refuse responsibility until they're confident things won't go wrong.
That's just how it works for other engineering disciplines; with the license, the scapegoat has the legal power to refuse responsibility until they're confident things won't go wrong.
Even top software companies have things break or go wrong very frequently compared to traditional engineering.
I don't see this as a good solution in the software world.