I think the article does quite a good job of explaining why this isn't necessarily an obvious mistake.
Sounds like quite a canny lawyer to me!
Sounds like quite a canny lawyer to me!
* no discussion of scibeners errors
* no mention of the effect on citi of being forced to buy 900m in bonds/debt they never consented to buy
* no discussion of the chilling effect on the wider credit system
* no discussion of why all the other creditors returned their payment without issue
"Should this money be returned" is a fair and interesting question. The answer is Yes and for a long list of reasons. But the article picks a single one, a technical one and the example used is a bit weak. Theres still a lot of meat left on these bones imho :)