To think about jobs after that event seems absurd.
To think about jobs after that event seems absurd.
"Your scientists were so focused on whether they could, they forgot to ask themselves whether they should".
The sheer power of it would be incredible, which is why this is a step that should not be taken lightly or accidentally.
I personally am interested in a society where work is 100% optional. And I think AGI would enable that.
How do you view AGI in relation to economic effects on the world?
People can keep doing petty political fights but they'll quiet down when the food and basic goods land in their house without them lifting a finger, I think. And it's going to be made better if it's done by robots and not other people.
People will simply divide in two: those who want the automated labor goods, and those who prefer hand-crafted goods. The latter will also be willing to pay more.