From some point of view, this might be viewed as management taking a harsh line against employees who make demands on their employers to do something other than maximize shareholder returns.

One of the longstanding contradictions of Silicon Valley ethos is that we will simultaneously talk about "mission" and "impact"—and, implicitly, the social impact of our work—while applauding management efforts to stamp out employee activism as a principled stance.

At the same time, as American politics in particular become increasingly polarized, many of us may be forced to decide between being professionals—and the apoliticism that implies—and being engaged citizens.

Edit: Reading some other posts here, I'm struck by some other trends at play:

- The shifting of—or, more pointedly, fragmentation of the "Overton Window" of acceptable behavior.

- The longstanding tendency in tech companies to have porous boundaries between "work" and "social" spheres.

- The above-mentioned rhetoric in tech companies to promote an idea of "mission" that goes beyond mere profit.

Along with increasing political polarization and (worse) delegitimization, these are all trends that make it harder to keep politics out of the workplace, and harder to balance "activism" with "professional" conduct.

I don't think Coinbase's approach will prove to be a lasting one.