Exactly. This is something I've pondered in thinking through some of these proposals - if one wanted to pursue these policies and actually protect high risk folks, that alone would likely have significant impacts.
E.g. KFF estimated that a quarter of workers are at high risk of severe illness with Covid - https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/almost-... - of course, some of these folks will be in jobs amenable to work from home. But, for the rest of them? That's a lot of the workforce either a) temporarily leaving the workforce (oh hello, economic consequences) or b) staying in, and accepting the increased risk from community spread (oh hello, more death).
> That is a rather coy statement. They don't even give us a clue how that could actually work.
Yep, lots of hand waving in that one. It's hard to take this declaration with any seriousness given the lack of substance.