There is credible information that this information is a part of a Russian disinformation effort to influence the campaign.
Now whether it's true or not is irrelevant. If the FBI has warned this information is suspect and is actively investigating then it is only appropriate for Facebook to err on the side of caution. Especially given we are weeks from an election.
I went looking for this and found this recent CNN article that looked promising. [1] But it does not mention any evidence (credible or otherwise) tying the laptop to Russians. It notes various weaknesses in the story, most notably that the emails were in image form, so contained no headers. But even if the emails were completely fabricated, that doesn't implicate Russians. Can you point me to the credible information you referenced?
1: https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/16/politics/russian-disinformati...
Have you made this up in advance to justify the censorship, or do you have a reference?
https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/world/america-votes/biden-emai...
No that is extremely relevant, for it to be "disinformation" it would need to be false
If the information is true, then the public should be informed about it, at the point the source is irrelevant.
I cant believe you discount or ignore corruption because was reveled by "evil Russia"
Some how I believe if the Russians where talking about Trump your sensibilities would be much different.. Not that I believe this NY Post story is some Russian plot because I dont,
You have to elect them before you know anything about them...
Seems like a good way to get the best leaders