I'm happy to settle for a "only" a couple millennia of life. More than I get now.
I'm happy to settle for a "only" a couple millennia of life. More than I get now.
Bits rot, things break down, and it tends to happen to technology more quickly in most cases than to the human body. The more complex technology is, the faster it fails. We measure the life cycle of our most modern tech in months, not centuries.
The idea that you're going to surf the universe in an immortal, inviolate android body untouchable by aeons of time is closer to a religious hope than likely reality.
from the pov of your current consciousness, does it really matter to be copied?
At least, you would leave an old you behind. Which from my intuition would be "me".
I understand "me" would also live on, but at that point I think I would just prefer to die.
Neurons are created and die all the time. Replacing them one at a time, with their virtual equivalent, would not be entirely different to what is already happening.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3106107/ https://www.nature.com/articles/nm1198_1313 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4812798/
However , in the scenario that single neurons are replaced with artificial copies with exact same synaptic weights, then yes they are functionally equivalent. It's already happening, with deep brain implants etc.