Stanford Business School professor Jeffrey Pfeffer wrote a book about this[1] in particular.
[1]: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/24331490-leadership-bs
A book about how toxic this is and how it needs to change, right? This small detail seems sort of missing from your comment.
Doesn't this cut both ways? Google employed her to critique the company's ethics; she is critiquing the company's ethics - as such, she is literally doing the job she was employed to do.
If Google doesn't want that role to exist or wants a puppet to do it, why did Google employ her in the first place?
"Corporate culture" isn't fixed, the whole point is that it needs changing.
Hacker news also requires a certain amount of politeness in the way you speak and it's one of the many reasons the discourse is better than twitter.