Hacker News Reader

While that's certainly not a stellar take on things, none of those points seem to be indicating that "Blue Origin is not doing well". Those seem like pretty standard occurrences for anyone who's worked on a large iterative engineering team. I remember reading similar stuff about SpaceX back in the Falcon9 1.0 days.

View on HN

If you're comparing their rocket to Falcon 9 1.0 from 7 - 10 years ago, that is concerning, especially when they were founded 2~ years earlier.

Right and a lot of SpaceX's scrappiness and scrambling was due to funding constraints in the early days - if you're running your rocket program like a broke startup when you get $1B/year from daddy Bezos, something's amiss. But broadly, they've been around for 20 years and haven't put anything into orbit yet, so it's hard to call it a serious program.

I know the goals and scale are different, but Astra's on the cusp of orbit after only 5 years and orders of magnitude less investment. Something at BlueOrigin is seriously broken: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astra_(aerospace)

It feels like Blue Origin is Jeff Bezo’s hobby. A very, very, very expensive hobby.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com