That first check alone more than tripled my money - and came with a cap table, too, so I could see the $1m+ payouts to each founder as a nice little lesson in the disparity between founder and early-employee outcomes.
Not that I'm complaining - this has turned into the single highest-performing investment I've ever made :) Career-wise it launched me into the big leagues. A+, would do it all again.
The only other startup that paid me equity money, I got enough to buy a used motorcycle. Yay.
Having said that there are significant protections in UK law for employee share schemes
Why would you expect options to pay big for a non-unicorn? Unicorn means the startup investment succeeded in its goal. No one gets rich when their investment fails.
> Why would you expect options to pay big for a non-unicorn?
I think the idea is that there should be a good swath of successful startups between "failed" and "unicorn". Indeed, the whole name unicorn came about because they used to be incredibly rare. So the parent is really asking "If you were in a moderately successful startup, did you get anything out of your equity?"
If you choose a company that ends up achieving a 500 million valuation as engineer #100, then your time will be wasted, massively. You will end up making no or -ve amounts of money.
My situation is far more common than the people making millions from unicorns at IPO.
The majority of exits don't come from IPOs. They come from acquisitions of small-ish companies by big or medium size companies. These don't make headlines because they're not very noteworthy for the average person.