Hacker News Reader

Comment by qsort | Hacker News Reader

> Like science, it's an ongoing project to minimize harm in a very real way.

What would this "very real" way be? Different people have widely different objective functions they are trying to maximize. The expectation that we should always attempt to pursue cosmic justice is completely unrealistic.

We already have a proper way of enforcing "very real" ways to curtail abuses, it's called passing laws.

There probably is a place for serious, proper discussion of what the proper working ethics for a software engineer are, but it's nowhere near as preminent as the zeitgeist is suggesting.

View on HN

> We already have a proper way of enforcing "very real" ways to curtail abuses, it's called passing laws.

And how is it decided what should become illegal? Just passing laws banning unethical things? Now we are back to square one deciding what is and isn't ethical.

The ballot box.

But who writes the words that go on the ballots? Ballots are not like Ouija boards. Someone has to make a proposal for others to vote on. The person who writes that will be an ethicist, if not by title, then by the fact that they wrote the text of a proposal to ban something unethical.

Who ever pays the politicians the most money.

Could you expand upon the ethical implications of this?

No, they also pay the salaries of the ethicists at the universities.

Who's talking about cosmic justice? Don't be ridiculous. We can identify instances of harm and that's about it.

Every system dealing in dichotomies (including binary) will eventually fail in reality, which always is more nuanced. Exactly how it fails depends on our knowledge, biases and our ability to account for them.

The problem is that flawed, biased AI systems are presented as neutral and fair, when they can never be. Ethics is what you get when you genuinely care about other peoples reality, not just following the law.

One of the points of corporate ethics is to avoid pissing off the public so much that laws get enacted to regulate you.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com