Hacker News Reader

To suggest that any of these people would have any other objectives in mind than the public's health is irresponsible conspiracy theorizing.

View on HN

To suggest that these people are 100% focused on human health is to ignore human motivations.

I'm very disappointed in you Andrew. You're playing the "conspiracy" card to suppress discussion.

Are we not ask who is going to profit from this?

Are we not ask what their motivations are?

Are we not allowed to question the motives of others?

I'm very disappointed that people are no longer allowed to express certain opinions or ask certain questions online without being downvoted, flagged, and marked a conspiracy theorist.

Simply flagging a post and calling someone a conspiracy theorists is the new way to suppress discussion.

My apologies, I was being 100% sarcastic, which is now much harder to see because your OP was flagged, even though it was nothing more than a list of some of the people involved in the creation of this app. Poe's Law is in full effect with the see-no-conspiracy crowd these days!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com