It has to do with your argument being a bad argument.

> Only 10 in 200,000 died from a vaccine

This doesn't negate the fact that vaccines can be dangerous. This just happens to be the number for that particular vaccine.

> 10 in 200,000 deaths is better than 1 in 100

The 10 could have been fine without the vaccine. Who knows, it's just speculation; maybe they had pre-existing conditions, maybe they did not. But comparing numbers like this knowing that the 10 in 200,000 are drawn from a different population from the 1 in 100 is being disingenuous.