Hacker News Reader

Comment by veyron | Hacker News Reader

customers with large numbers of machines dont necessarily care about having latest software. They care about stability. They don't just upgrade willy-nilly.

Upgrading 7-zip [first entry on your screenshot] isn't compulsory. If you do upgrade, you take a risk that there will be no adverse effect.

View on HN

Actually I tend to differ with that statement. Latest software is always more secure and less buggy. I would personally prefer having my workstations with all the latest software.

Veyron is right. While newer software may be less buggy, it isn't always. New features may break old features, or break other pieces of software.

Older software is usually vetted and proven functional in the particular corporate environment where it's deployed, doesn't conflict with other software, etc. My friends in corporate world have told me how it takes X many months for upgrades to be rolled out because they must be tested in sandboxes first to make sure nothing explodes unexpectedly.

This apparently applies to all software, from OS updates down to individual program updates.

Ok well, but you're not going to keep the version around forever... you will update at some point in time, and uDeployer can serve you when you need to.

"Latest software is always more secure and less buggy" <-- ooh that's a dangerous statement. When new features are added, sometimes bugs creep up.

I agree with Veyron. It's also a stumbling block in the sales process (my day job). Often the decision makers aren't really technical and are very afraid of bugs and crashes and changing anything. It's not impossible to get around the objection, but you should expect it.

No offense, but how old are you and are you not a native US citizen?

I am curious because your comments, and the way they are worded make it sound like you are not from the US and you are young.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com