Is a link to the blog of said co-founder, where she discusses her philanthropy.
Her Wikipedia page describes her as "an American novelist and philanthropist" and the largest section of that page is entitled "Philanthropy".
I don't mean to criticize Mackenzie for this, just the unnecessary (and inaccurate) editorializing of the HN post title.
She goes by MacKenzie Scott.
However: What should "384 ways to help?" tell me? It's clickbait.
The edited title at least gives me an idea what the content is all about. It's so good it actually serves as a summary.
It's incredibly refreshing.
There is a difference in this strange other land between publishing the donations with some explanations so those interested can find out, and the usual way, which involves PR pieces, interviews abs dinner plates at a grand a pop.
I mean I had no idea she had done this, yet I watched a big robo-ball follow Jeff around a garden.
So yeah, I would think that, in this weird land, that was actually, quiet :-)
Edit: and now I’m getting downvoted. C’mon HN, be more diverse than this.
Better to just give a compensatory upvote and move on. Commenting on downvotes helps no one and is against the guide lines.
Charitable donations are great, more people should donate to private charities that benefit their communities as I strongly believe many of these organizations genuinely do more good than government programs! However, her blog screams "look how much money I gave away" / "I'm one of the good rich people - please don't kill me when you decide to pillage the rich".