Either you want peace and prosperity or you don’t. You can’t cherry-pick your stance towards law based on who’s breaking it.
There’s nothing hard to understand about it, but then again people love to play dumb in questions like these. I don’t understand it to be honest.
Besides, I find it disingenious to equate lies about election fraud without evidence leading to riot and assault on core democratic process, and people fighting/defending the right not to be assaulted and killed by armed police. But that argument is besides the point of this issue.
You are well within your right BTW to find the comparison disingenious. I find it too. However, I'm not interested in giving one group of people power to do whatever they want without legal repercussions and enforce it on another group of people. Should the law not be equal to all?