The fired agent telegraphed which law she believed has been violated when she said, "I just got fired because I'm a Christian and a conservative."
Is being active on Gab and Parler a Christian religious activity?
Being "a Christian" (whatever that means...) is a protected class - but where in the Bible did Moses or Jesus command people to use Gab, Parler - or even be "conservative"?
You can be fired for being a selfish ass (I'm referring to the donkey hybrid, as befits the biblical narrative) - and that's my interpretation of what happened. What matters now is if the law will allow her to use her religion as the basis for being an ass - or not.
It is in California (and various other states).
https://reason.com/volokh/2020/07/26/laws-protecting-private...
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/can-employers-discri...
Specifically: “ Even if you work in a state that doesn’t protect employees from political discrimination, you might still have a legal claim if your employer’s actions were really based on a protected trait under Title VII or a similar state law. For example, if African American employees are fired for participating in a Black Lives Matter rally, but employees of other races are not fired for going to marches, rallies, or protests, that might qualify as illegal race discrimination. ”
You don’t have enough information to say either way, and the law and courts aren’t as cut-and-dry as you want to believe.
Even the social media choices may be subject, because it may depend largely on how the employer perceived it at the time.
But now liberals here are saying that refusing to hire or firing people from a predominantly Republican and/or Christian social network is different.
It's the same. That position is hypocritical regardless of whether you think it should be legal.
Correct.
However, given the wider social context I’m making an inference from the facts that are established.