Hacker News Reader

I'm not a climate scientist or anything near, but from skimming the article I understood that the new model estimated worst predictions than previous models. Like you can't talk about "reality" of the future that didn't happened yet. Please correct me if I misunderstood something

View on HN

I thought they were saying that the most recent actual measurements were worse than any of the models predicted, and simply projecting those trends into the future is also worse than the upper edges of the model upper bounds estimates.

That makes sense but was not what I understood. I may have to re read the article

Reply on news.ycombinator.com