Hacker News Reader

If you read closely i'm proposing government use only, where each governing body participating in the system has access to it.

You can keep compute systems down - i'm more interested in immutability and distributed nature than the trust issue of blockchain.

View on HN

Then you don't need blockchain. Once you have trust among the participants, you don't need blockchain.

as i said - I'm more interested in a immutability of the whole chain, without any backdoors to modify old data because - speaking form experience - that leads to way more problems when dealing with local governments.

And the point myself and others are making is that you can get that without using blockchain. Blockchain is a specific technology that requires proof-of-work among distrusted actors for modifying a cryptographically secure distributed ledger. It sounds like you just want a cryptographically secure distributed ledger.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com