Why does it have to be one or the other?
Some relationships absolutely cause less destruction by ending. Some provide sufficiently despite great flaws.
Some relationships absolutely cause less destruction by ending. Some provide sufficiently despite great flaws.
My culture (and that of like 3/4 of the world’s population) says that’s a bad thing for kids and society as a whole. I used to think westerners were enlightened and had the right idea on allowing and encouraging individual freedom in this area, but now I think they’ve got it wrong. And it’s hard to really know without focusing on what’s been the aggregate effect.
But if they can't get along, I'm sure it's terrible. Just like if the parents stay together?