Hacker News Reader

That would be the wrong metric. A sandwich shop could become profitable much faster than a Google, but I'd much rather invest in the next Google.

View on HN

Well, it still has to be a good sandwich shop to succeed, and I'd rather invest in a successful sandwich shop than one which will flop. So I'm just curious to know the overall track record of success had by YC funded companies - from a perspective other than 'got more funding' or 'is valued at X'.

Investors would rather invest in a company that has a 1% shot at being Google than 100% shot at being a normally successful sandwich shop.

But can we make the assumption that YC companies are chosen because they have the potential at becoming the next Google, therefore if they are profitable they're on their way towards that goal?

It's a small assumption, but I think one that could be made.

It makes more of a success/failure comparison than a return percentage calculation, but it would still be really interesting to know.

Yes exactly. I definitely didn't mean to say I wanted the numbers for profitable as opposed to the '1% chance of being Google'.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com