No, I don’t understand the subject in depth to have arguments against it.
When I don’t understand a subject in depth, I look for the source credibility to decide if it’s read worthy before going down the rabbit hole of making sense out of it.
I'm reminded of Nikola's director of hydrogen tech - guy had no degree in anything close to hydrogen and had worked doing driveways. I am skeptical in those cases, as I am here!
So I'd seriously looking at something like journalistic or academic fraud or plagiarism with this guys background.