Hacker News Reader

The article does say that Rome required some level of constant migration into the city to maintain it's population.

I can't speak to how true that is but it might explain the population numbers.

I think that's perhaps rather generically true for premodern times. I've seen estimates of mortality rates for medieval England that have cities consistently higher than rural areas, so you'd have to have migration to the cities.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com