I mean, this gives you all the control, you can charge for all sorts of services and "value adds". There's no reason you, as the maker of this software, would want this available as a block chain.
Unless you also create a token and start having people speculate on your anti-counterfeiting blockchain?
That's what it looks like to me anyway.
Jacob Collier tried to sell an nft that granted lifetime access to his concerts.
The appeal of such an nft is that it can be traded independently of any third party, on the open market.
Of course it depends on Jacob's promise to honor it.
He went back on it when people raised environmental issues.
The arguments about SpicyNFTs is just kind of a distraction. It would be like if I argued against banks by saying, I could hang a shingle, accept deposits, and then just run with the money.
Do we really need to enumerate all the possible ways that a new, very limited, technology can be misused? We might be here a while, I'm pretty sure there are infinitely many ways that NFTs can be abused.
In other words, worthless.
It could be tied to an actual contract.
The value prop of an NFT is pretty much limited to just being able to transfer it reliably without relying on a trusted third party.
It's not like it provides a cryptographic guarantee that some contract that exists outside it will be honored.