To Tesla’s credit, they have reportedly recently started using gaze tracking on cars equipped with a passenger-facing cam, which is much harder to circumvent. If you look at literally every other public sale automaker doing self driving, they use gaze tracking.
It's like pulling high negative G in a Cessna 172 and then blaming the manufacturer when the wings fall off.
but to honest, when left to its own devices the car drove at high speed into a tree. Its not a subtle obstacle. If the car can't figure out what is going on in this senario, thats not a good look.
Diving autonomously is hard, but not running into static obstacles seems one of the more basic things.
Was it "left to its own devices" though?
You can't put the car in drive from the back seat.
Autosteer is limited to 5MPH over the speed limit unless you are on a divided highway.
The car seems to have accelerated faster than it normally accelerates under autopilot.
Something doesn't add up here.
The driver deliberately set out to sabotage mechanisms which are there to protect you.
A more apt comparison would be if the pilot disabled the stall warning on the aircraft. Then attempted to do low flying maneuvers at the threshold of the aircraft's stall speed.
If someone deliberately disables safety features, they hold the bag.
The big thing I have to wonder about is how on earth did they get the car going so fast on residential streets? Autopilot is hard-coded to limit you to 5MPH over the speed limit. I know you can push the gas down with a brick or something stupid like that, but doing that disables the car's ability to slow down or stop automatically which is a pretty fundamental part of what Autopilot does and how it operates.
So many people look at this as if the driver pushed a simple bypass button to get around a safety feature, but getting a Tesla going fast enough to wrap itself around a tree on a residential street is not simple at all.
[1] https://www.amazon.com/QCKJ-Steering-Autopilot-Assisted-Auxi...
and then purposely burned to death to really sell the story? that's dedication!
This one sounds like an ID10T error.