Yeah that has nothing to do with the issue at hand. What Google is doing has larger implications than your personal vendetta against Daily Mail.
Good. It's anecdotal I do not care. Basing your decisions on anecdotal emotional evidence from some random poster on the internet is pure idiocy.
If someone told you this story about their dead 5 year old in person, would you be so abrasive?
I suspect if you would, rightly or wrongly, you’d probably be faced with violence
You aren’t being clever by dismissing people’s feelings and stories.
Besides, give it some thought, are you being so rude based on emotions? Would you be replying like this if there weren’t politics involved? If it was some other company the Mail were attacking?
Lay out the facts as to why it's good/bad or don't say anything at all. Some personal story about how it made you feel bad is irrelevant and actually harmful to making an informed decision. Toddlers use emotional reasoning, be an adult.
but this is not that. this is a presumably real person telling a story that’s very sensitive to them. they’re not trying to trick you, or manipulate you. they’re just giving an example of how they were treated by the daily mail
you’re acting like a petulant autistic child
everyone - including you - uses emotional reasoning. you will learn this at some point. even if you don’t want people to be emotional, they are. the human world is emotional, and trying to navigate it while being a dick to anyone who shows emotions will serve you extremely poorly
finally your rude tone betrays your hypocrisy. you’re emotionally involved in this, and you’re not acting rationally because of it
I'll make my own decision on whether it's bad. I do not want it filtered out before I even get to make that decision.
This desire to stop people from seeing stuff you dislike is really weird and reeks of authoritarianism. The option for you is to not click on anything from DM. Except you then go on and force your beliefs on everyone else by making it so they don't get the option to choose and that just means you want to control what they think and believe. I find that attitude abhorrent. The irony is that people doing these are supposedly so anti right wing and yet they do exactly what the Republicans were doing with censorship in the 90s.
Your rationale seems to boil down to "I hate when other people impose their values on me, I'd much prefer to impose my values on them"
perhaps cnn has competent web designers