Hacker News Reader

Comment by grumpyautist | Hacker News Reader

Absurd conclusions drawn here. Is the author supposing that they conceptually didn't understand different enthicities before Darwin? I highly doubt the basic premise that they are drawing conclusions from.

The concepts of different people being, well, different, existed before Darwin did. The article is confusing semantics with concepts

View on HN

Yes, but because they talked about it using proxies of ethnicity, such as religion, geography, or nation*, we are to believe they were completely race-blind.

* The word nation came from the Old French [8th-14th century] word nacion – meaning "birth" (naissance), "place of origin" -, which in turn originates from the Latin word natio (nātĭō) literally meaning "birth". - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation

How does simply lacking a more exacting term for race mean that they had no concept of people who were different? In historical context is a nation not usually comprised of a phenotype?

They absolutely did have a concept of people who are different, it just did not mean what “race” means today per se. A list of some of the ethnic groups or nationalities can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_Chinese_histo.... The authors larger and more interesting point is that the all encompassing “Han” ethnic group that is said to make up a majority of people in mainland China is mostly a myth.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com