Hacker News Reader

VNC let you choose between slow or low-quality.

Low-latency (in terms of <10ms) high-fidelity (4k@60fps) video streaming is not a solved problem. It is hard engineering.

How does interactions with local resources e.g. uploading a file work with Mighty, or VNC?

Ah, classic HN. There can't possibly be a post on here about something new without someone going off about how $more_complex_technology already exists.

It's easier to use.

Your parent probably meant that there is nothing specific to Chrome in this technology, which / because it looks like VNC, not that the technology is useless because there is already VNC.

It's because we're not impressed with people reinventing the wheel and putting a new sticker on it. History repeats itself. We've seen it before. Maybe this is drastically different, innovative or helpful, but so far its just meh.