Unfortunately a lot of HN readers are dismissing this or calling it partisan grandstanding, just because it's Texas that filed it.
Unfortunately a lot of HN readers are dismissing this or calling it partisan grandstanding, just because it's Texas that filed it.
I don't doubt they "won" in the end, but I'm baffled that they brag about "competing" like that.
Oracle for years secretly lobbied states, Justice Department to sue Google - Bloomberg (2020-12-23)
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-23/oracle-fo...
where can I read more on why they allowed this?
To think, just a decade ago, this article seemed paranoid, to the point where even the author seemed to think it was an oversight in the Terms of Service:
https://techland.time.com/2012/04/26/will-google-drive-snoop...
Interestingly, they give (gave?) themselves redistribution and performance rights for Drive contents at the same time. How long until they start openly using those rights, I wonder?
Drive is unencrypted because it is indexed for personal search. What is the snooping part?
> redistribution and performance rights for Drive
This is completely standard and required so that they can provide syncing and sharing.
I am aware that Whatsapp does this and have avoided Whatsapp’s Google Drive backup overall.