As the article admits, they'll probably find someone to do this for free. And if someone agrees to do this for free, we'll, that's how much it costs.
I'm sure they'll get their money's worth.
I'm sure they'll get their money's worth.
The irony here is that they wouldn't be able to do this if they just wanted people to act as photographers, not actually take any photos, because the various actors unions wouldn't allow it. Even nameless extras make $10-$15/hr or more for the time they are required to be on set.
If I took a gig like this, I'd be damn sure that:
1) I am included in the rolling credits,
2) I have several cameo shots within the show,
3) I can use thumbnails of my appearances within my own web site and
4) that I am able to use the show's logo and likeness to promote my own business.
My site would lead off with :
"Award winning photographer. You may have seen my work recently on the hit Netflix show, 'Love Is Blind'".
2) Could be useful for future business. It's a display of authority if positioned right. Just like any good portfolio piece.
3,4) Then don't take the contract.
With any business, you are trying to project trust, authority, quality. You could leverage this as such.
Hubris much?
The inconvenient truth that exploiters want to misdirect from here is that your ability to negotiate all the things you mentioned is not negated by a clause to actually get paid _in addition_ to receiving exposure.
Another little dirty secret: bylines in your website don't mean shit. The money comes from networking.
'Love Is Blind' was "sampled by 30 million member households."
If your business's demographic would be in a similar cohort as the show, then this work could be used to project authority. I know of this show. My wife does.
If a local photographer demonstrated that they were in the show, their work is great, I would find them interesting. I wouldn't blindly give them my business, but at least they don't blend in like 100's of other photographers.
If you can't envision exactly how you would use this as a promotional piece or blindly expect that just by doing the work you'd get a magical windfall of additional business, then this isn't for you. Don't sign.
>Another little dirty secret: bylines in your website don't mean shit. The money comes from networking.
Empty bylines? Sure. But a byline that states your competency and goes on to display that competency by supporting it with 1) beautiful work and 2) having well known clients? That helps to solidify the case of why they should work with you.
"Feel free to reach out to any of my previous clients. I will give you their contact info if you need a reference or two before working together. "
Our company actually got paid big bucks to work on these household name projects and they used the portfolio to full advantage to land new contracts. But here's the key thing: there was a business development team reaching out to prospective clients and putting blood and sweat into presentations and proposals. At one point, leadership decided that they were going to try the "let our brand/portfolio speak for itself" idea (which amounts to the same as expecting credits to do the work for you), and in the next town hall meeting, they were very clear that that was the worst idea they had ever tried in the history of the business.
So, sure, having a recognizable brand under your belt can serve as leverage, but as they say, a large number times zero is still zero. If a single high profile thing is the only crutch in your portfolio, or if the description of responsibilities looks inflated, people will notice that you're a one trick pony. You're still going to have to invest the time to build a proper network and reputation if you expect to be on fast-dial for household name projects.
:)
Don't you first need to win an award?
I have never heard of the concept of a "fair market" beyond what any given person considers fair on a case by case basis.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fairmarket.asp > 404
Free market is something like a technical term with a generally accepted definition within economics (sure you could squabble about the details of this definition)
Fair Market value is a saying that means you got what something is worth. Semantically you would break it up as (fair) (market value) not (fair market) (value). There is no implied shared definition of a fair market in an economic sense and that phrase is not implying that the sale was done in the context of a subjectively ethically "fair" circumstance. I think you are well aware of this though.
Taking this job is honestly a financial liability - there's a chance your fancy equipment will be damaged (you should calculate wear and tear into the costs for every job) so be sure not to use anything that costs more than the expected damages.