Bay Area housing prices tend to appreciate at that rate or faster, and you can acheive much more leverage with better downside risk protection buying housing, since California is a non-recourse state. Plus, it replaces a rental expense you would otherwise have, which a stock market investment doesn’t: you can’t live in an ETF.
Risk is higher, too, so its not all upside.
Risk is priced in to both asset classes. Nothing is set in stone.
Yes there are maintenance items if you own and need to set aside money for those things.
Factors like:
- Can you rent the type of property you want
- For houses in particular, are you willing to put work in
- How mobile do you want to be
- How important is it to customize the property to how you want it
etc.
The catch is, I get to live in it. I made it awesome. I put a ton of money on the kitchen, the bathroom, etc to make it something I'll never be able to rent (without paying 9-10k/month anyway, and I can't afford that). I was able to do all that while still coming up only SLIGHTLY below renting + investing the extra.
There's a certain emotional value to buying a house that the math can't capture. Even JUST with the financial math, it's pretty close (and sometimes an amazing investment, in the right market). But once you tack on the emotional value, it shits all over the alternative (for people who want a home to call their own).
I can't think of any other purchase where you can get something you really want, AND have that thing be a mediocre or better investment at the same time. I can't live inside of my S&P500 position.
My taxes are about 25-30% of my mortgage payment (after a massive residential exemption, too), and if you have a slightly more expensive than average home in a low cost area (so things like school taxes will be higher to raise a similar amount of money per child), it can get reaaaaally expensive.
On the other hand, I chose to manage my own taxes instead of having the lender escrow it for me, so I get to see them separately. It helps putting things in perspective.
It's the rare market where rents are set according to how much it costs to provide the rental, as that would be a market that is oversupplied, and most governments work hard to prevent that from happening. In supply-constrained markets, rents are set by what the market can pay, not based on how much property taxes are or interest rates for mortgages or maintenance costs.