The platonic ideal of a space safe for all ideologies doesn't exist, so let me rephrase: imagine someone posted a podcast of an ideologue, in a place where you feel safe expressing your opinion, as the detractors of your Joe Rogan piece felt safe where you posted him.

Certainly with a PhD you can't actually have been surprised by the reaction to your post. What's the point of your performative surprise? Do you think people shouldn't have disagreed with Joe Rogan, or been angry with him? Is it that you don't feel safe expressing your opinion in certain places, because so many people disagree with it, and that's wrong, you should be afforded the same ideological safety as the woke crowd when among them? I don't understand, I guess. It all still seems very lacking in theory of mind. You can't change the world for the better by trolling.