These are internal codenames I think, not the marketing names.
Of course the fact that the codenames are used more often than the marketing names is itself a marketing failure.
Of course the fact that the codenames are used more often than the marketing names is itself a marketing failure.
You really need the architecture name to compare processors, and AMD currently has more usable architecture names; even if their processor number are still a disaster, zen 1 vs zen 3 is clear.
Name it something like "Intel Smart Core i3" with the introduction of little.BIG architecture. If those live up to the battery life hype, then the naming would even be justified.