It really is simple; Texas generally fears a tyrannical government more than they fear a random shooting. So they give freedom to guns to spread out power. While certainly not risk-free, I think it's a legitimate stance.
It really is simple; Texas generally fears a tyrannical government more than they fear a random shooting. So they give freedom to guns to spread out power. While certainly not risk-free, I think it's a legitimate stance.
“Texas Governor Abbott says he will sign a bill that prevents cities from defunding police”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-defund-police-bill-abbott...
“Gov. Greg Abbott signs 'fetal heartbeat' bill banning most abortions in Texas”
https://www.statesman.com/story/news/politics/state/2021/05/...
Freedom lists like this could go on for pages.
When Texas Governor Abbott prohibited local counties, cities, towns, districts and public health agencies from making their own decisions about face masks, how is that "spreading out power" to avoid the dangers of centralized "tyrannical government"?
https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-issues-execu...
When the centralized state government forces cities and counties to remove voting locations, that's not "spreading out power".
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-houston-greg-abbott...
Thus there is no hypocrisy in a state governor wanting less local power and more state power. In this framework, The State is after all the atomic point where no further decentralization is possible.
In this situation, the gun is power, and thus the gun is abused.
You could definitely say this about their self contained power grid.
If Texas was so interested in spreading out power, then surely they would be more willing to trust their elected, representational Federal government instead of having a Texas specific version of everything?
> Texas generally fears a tyrannical government more than they fear a random shooting
Why do you think this is the case?