The definitions given for these "logical fallacies" are packed with rancourous comments that don't throw light on the nature of the fallacy. The names given for them are not the standard names; the classical Aristotelian fallacies are usually named in Latin (and they aren't all there).

And indeed, a lot of the so-called fallacies are not fallacies at all, because they aren't a type of faulty argument or reasoning; they're just sayings.

This is a much better list of fallacy definitions: https://www2.palomar.edu/users/bthompson/Introduction%20to%2...

It doesn't claim to be a "master list"; in fact it states on the front page that a complete list is impossible.

> Open Courseware | OCW |This work is dedicated to the Public Domain..

A benefit of having such a doc on GitHub would be the ease with which others could critique and contribute, potentially making the list stronger.