What about people who live in freezing climates, like Sweden or Alaska? Aren't we reducing harm to those people?
- Milder winters mean more ticks and pests survive to eat lumber and spread disease, causing personal harm as well as economic.
- Warmer and drier summers decrease agricultural output
- A grater variety of rainfall cause mudslides and property damage increases
- Snakes can survive further north, to the mountains eating birds eggs which have never needed to understand the danger of them
- Boars survive winters better, causing destructions to agriculture.
- Higher frequently of forest fires.
- Algae at the coast bloom more intensely, preventing tourism and suffocates other species.
Everywhere that isn't green will be uninhabitable under a worst case 4C warming scenario. How do you think that balances out?
For the sake of accuracy, I should note that the map leaves off Antarctica, a substantial portion of which will become habitable under this scenario.
how do you know that the models show accurate results that match and predict real measurements? Where is the code to verify that there's no post-factum editing and fitting the results into the desired interpretations? Who is performing verification? Is it made open-source for independent reviews?
I'm simply not willing to spend effort digging up a reference for someone who won't read it. Literally all you had to say was "I'd like the reference please, so I can read it," but you did not. So, it seems I was right. Given your attitude, I don't even believe you intended to do what you said you were going to do in good faith.
Have a nice day.