Best part of the article is the footnote, where the author characterizes his own papers:
> This paper is bullshit, this paper (a NeurIPS oral) is bullshit, this paper is complete bullshit, this paper is mostly good science but also has a sprinkling of bullshit. Apologies to my co-authors.
https://jacobbuckman.com/2021-05-29-please-commit-more-blata...