I have confirmation bias here because this is a result I would have expected BUT..
Preprint, non-peer reviewed.
Preprint, non-peer reviewed.
We need replication.
If anything has shown up the weakness in science over the last few years it is this veneration of peer review. It ain't working that well any more.
a while back I looked to see how long it actually took for the peer reviewed studies to come out for previous diseases and outbreaks, such as SARS 1. It was too long and we have to weigh inputs right now and react now.
So let me ask you this, what's the worst case scenario if they're right but had waited 6 months to get it reviewed? Then consider, what's the worst case scenario if they're wrong?
So.. no change? At least in the US, we're already at the point where we have more vaccines than people who want them.
I say this about every study
My main point is that it likely wont get peer reviewed, ever, unless it goes viral and people ask questions