I post this because I think it's the exception that proves the rule. Dr. Kyle-Sidell is a physician of great perception and insight. For every one of him, there are no doubt hundreds of "hydroxychloroquine doctors" who peddle bullshit without scientific basis to the harm of their patients. But the existence of doctors like him does boost the "maverick doctor bucking the institution" narrative.
[1]: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/928156
[2]: https://elemental.medium.com/how-one-covid-19-doctor-became-...
They banned an interview with the inventor of mRNA vaccine tech for saying it might be dangerous and needs more caution and study.
as of today, the mechanism that made HCQ work has been explained scientifically, right? What is your bias regarding this?
Now, that the mechanism is better understood, the doctor who recommended HCQ has now moved on to a better suggestion utilizating the same mechanism.
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2021/01/27/does-lockdown-work-...
Under the heading "The damage inflicted by medical ideas"