I had a very similar idea, but I was thinking it'd be potentially employed against a geopolitical adversary with a large population and a tight or net import food supply. It could further put strain on the government to cope, thus reducing their threat.
Lack of protein in population diets probably also greatly reduces economic output.
Scary stuff, and anyone could use it against us.
You wouldn't even need gain of function. Just a more efficient vector. It seems almost impossible to get a virus to code for a carbohydrate pathway, and it would quickly be evolved out since it doesn't mediate adhesion or any critical function. Granted, there's a similar problem with supplying the alpha-gal in a parasite pathway.
Low tech air dropping lone star ticks seems like it would still produce the desired effect for the aggressor. And it'd be geographically limited impact unless the species spreads over time.
Biological warfare could be terrifying. We've just seen the first accidental use of it (assuming lab leak is what happened).
Back when I was a biochemistry student I had less scary thoughts, such as tranfecting the THC biochemical pathway into Kudzu to make it impossible to control. (I'm not into drugs but think the drug war is a drag on the US and its neighbors.)
Biology is like the computing field, it's just not as completely developed and fast paced. That could change in the future.
edit: again hit with the HN posting rate limit, and I'm not even downvoted. I think I have interesting insights given my background, but whatever. :(