[flagged]
> What is VEARS? [0][1]
> VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused a health problem
> Limitations of VAERS: [2]
> * It is generally not possible to find out from VAERS data if a vaccine caused the adverse event
> Are all adverse events reported to VAERS caused by vaccines? [2]
> No. Some adverse events might be caused by vaccination and others might be coincidental and not related to vaccination. Just because an adverse event happened after a person received a vaccine does not mean the vaccine caused the adverse event.
> VAERS accepts reports of adverse events following vaccination without judging the cause or seriousness of the event. VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused an adverse event, but it is good at detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of reporting that might indicate possible safety problems that need a closer look.
[0] https://www.openvaers.com/f-a-q
Sure, but let's not stop applying a critical eye and measured caution with things that are still in trial phase with inconclusive evidence for long term success.
But that “Perhaps” seems to be doing a lot of work there, which would normally be done by words such as “So far quite well”
Has any of their claims ever happened before? Random internet dude would benefit from offering some links to past examples, or his questions sound like he hasn’t done any honest attempt at research, but just made them up like a fairy tale villain.
That data doesn't necessarily establish a causal link between the vaccine and death.
Visiting a health care facility for instance already puts you at increased risk of a bacterial infection. Which is why I always take a long shower after.
If there is a direct connection with the vaccine how many of those people had a preexisting health condition that should've made them ineligible to receive it?
Please explain the exact mechanism through which this would happen