Why can there be no rich bitcoin holders? Sure you want coins distributed to some degree, but the mere fact that there are rich and poor bitcoin holders is natural and expected. And they will be the minority (less than 10 000).
The world would be worse off with such a distribution, IMO.
For the record, I'm pro wealth inequality and income inequality, so long as its coupled with social mobility and a high standard of living for the lower classes.
It has?
[1] [2018] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/01/...
[2] [2018] https://medium.com/predict/how-bitcoin-solves-the-problem-of...
[3] [2019] https://www.businessinsider.com/this-is-how-bitcoin-can-end-...
[4] [2021] https://www.forbes.com/sites/martinrivers/2021/06/15/how-bit...
Opinion pieces in mainstream outlets isn't exactly representative of "the community". The dates for those articles are also quite recent, within the last 3 years or so. Where are all the bitcointalk topics from 2011 (ie. "a decade" ago) where everyone collectively thought it was going to end wealth inequality?
[edit] I'll be the first to admit I wasn't there in 2010, but I'm led to believe they were discussing a 'peer to peer digital cash' so I guess a lot can change! Certainly the last 5 years have been filled with inequality narrative.
Further, I would argue that yes in the last 5 years once bitcoin entered the zeitgiest, that these mainstream thought pieces are actually more representative of 'the community' as retail gamblers poured in outnumbering earlier participants.