One of the biggest problems with open source software is enormously entitled users; who don't pay for it, don't work on it, yet feel remarkably offended when some whim of theirs is not catered to.
Just saying.
Just saying.
Regardless, their post contained only factual statements relevant to the discussion. I noticed no entitlement.
Or maybe you are referring to the other commenters who were entitled to expect that the one critical task of a crypto messenger is ensuring the confidentiality of communication, which has been broken by this bug (and at least one similar bug before it, https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/issues/7909 ).
You can both be grateful that Signal is free and at the same time call out shenanigans of its owners. Just saying.
If you produce a product that people depend on — and through which, you either intentionally or inadvertently cause damage to your user base — they have every reason to be upset.
If the product is open source, the user base luckily has the option to fix the problem.
This isn't true with Signal's model.