Craig Murray was warned multiple times that his blog posts were in contempt of court.
He should have taken down the blog posts, but instead doubled down.
Hard to see whence your outrage originates.
He should have taken down the blog posts, but instead doubled down.
Hard to see whence your outrage originates.
I believe the outrage originates from believing that he should not have been told to shut-up in the first place.
The rape and sexual assault complainers had their anonymity protected by court order. That's completely normal (in the UK anyway).
Craig Murray's not a martyr. He's an eejit.
Supposedly their claims were also without basis, so he was sentenced to prison for maybe possibly according to one judge maybe revealing the identities of somebody making a false claim of rape in a case that was itself likely politically motivated.
So, nothing fishy about any of that then.
Publishing somebody's name isn't the only way to deanonymise them.
> false claim of rape
This is a dangerously incorrect take, and it's completely unsubstantiated.