https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wild_animal_suffering https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinatalism
Suffering can be due to physical pain but not always. Sometimes it is due to lack of freedom. Parasites, bacteria, and viruses generally cause both pain and disability.
Nature is romanticized but like OP states, it is metal and cruel. When we can eradicate suffering through destroying the planet, it is our moral imperative to do so.
So far you have provided no counter arguments to this, instead you have misinterpreted my words and delegated to utterly worthless moral relativism.
Now you are changing the topic to try to implicate me as anti-human.
Stop and think about how you are debating with ill intentions - how you are trying to invalidate my previous arguments through ad hominem by painting me as someone who would destroy humanity. Extremely disappointing.
What do you have to say about the solution to wild animal suffering other than that some people will be sad?
Life is not a gemstone if it is pockmarked with suffering. It is our duty to eradicate suffering by all means necessary. This is why the most progressive countries in the world have legalized euthanasia. Because life is not the goal, happiness is. Death is not an enemy, suffering is.
Feels pretty whimsical to assume that one needs some kind of "right" to do what's right. What gives anyone the right to do anything?
It's a duty as a living being to help those in need. The cornerstone of all science and religion is eliminating suffering.
The logical entailment of such an imperative is to destroy the Earth swiftly after we have moved on. A swift end and none of the creatures on it will suffer, and the ones suffering will suffer no more..