I'm not going to continue this as it's not going anywhere. But as you're so adamant that he wasn't charged with jigsaw identification, and that it's only something his supporters claim (even though it's literally in the document you posted), you might want to take it upon yourself to reach out to the following publications and ask them to correct the record:
* The Guardian: "Ex-diplomat found in contempt of court over ‘jigsaw identification’" [1]
* BBC: "the retired diplomat breached the order and published pieces of information on his blog which, if pieced together like a jigsaw, could lead readers to establish the identities of the women" [2]
* The Independent: "Former diplomat hands himself in at police station to begin sentence over ‘jigsaw ID’ of Salmond accusers" [3]
* Daily Mail: "Lady Dorrian said Murray deliberately risked what is known as 'jigsaw identification'." [4]
* Scottish Legal News: "He published information on his blog which enabled jigsaw identification of the women in the case." [5]
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/aug/01/alex-salmon...
[2] https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-58018127
[3] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/craig-murray...
[4] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9849607/Britains-ex...
[5] https://www.scottishlegal.com/article/craig-murray-to-be-jai...