Hacker News Reader

What he's saying is that all of Linux's problems are with the kernel and surrounding low level code (which is quite stable, performs well, etc.), but with the integration, support and design of the distributions laid on top of them.

For example Ubuntu has made great strides in this regard, but some would say the continual, sometimes drastic changes in the shipped apps and modifications of the interface make it hard for users.

View on HN

I actually think he is being facetious. It may be true to say "it's not android", but as far as they end-user is concerned it _is_ android. It's got the logos, came with an android sticker on the box. For that user, when it comes to purchase or recommend another phone, will they make the same distinction or will their previous android experience influence their choice?

It's more of a statement about the culture and expectations growing up around Android, than about Android the technical artifact.

The technophiles are right about the point they make about the latter, but it's the former that will make or break it in the marketplace.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com