By the same logic, a far-right person could complain about a "veneer of neutrality" in the mainstream press's coverage of, say, the Proud Boys. But that would be ridiculous.
Some things really are objectively stupid as hell.
Some things really are objectively stupid as hell.
>'One prominent journalist argued for replacing “neutral objectivity” with “moral clarity”—making unflinching distinctions between right and wrong.'
This piece is certainly not an example of "neutral objectivity".
Gell-Mann Amnesia.